core/vm/program: evm bytecode-building utility #30725#1801
Merged
AnilChinchawale merged 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom Dec 8, 2025
Merged
core/vm/program: evm bytecode-building utility #30725#1801AnilChinchawale merged 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
AnilChinchawale merged 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
Conversation
gzliudan
changed the title
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
gzliudan
force-pushed
the
evm-program
branch
from
dcad332 to
36c44a1
Compare
gzliudan
requested review from
AnilChinchawale,
benjamin202410,
liam-lai and
wanwiset25
gzliudan
force-pushed
the
evm-program
branch
from
36c44a1 to
b0358c2
Compare
In many cases, there is a need to create somewhat nontrivial bytecode. A recent example is the verkle statetests, where we want a `CREATE2`- op to create a contract, which can then be invoked, and when invoked does a selfdestruct-to-self. It is overkill to go full solidity, but it is also a bit tricky do assemble this by concatenating bytes. This PR takes an approach that has been used in in goevmlab for several years. Using this utility, the case can be expressed as: ```golang // Some runtime code runtime := program.New().Ops(vm.ADDRESS, vm.SELFDESTRUCT).Bytecode() // A constructor returning the runtime code initcode := program.New().ReturnData(runtime).Bytecode() // A factory invoking the constructor outer := program.New().Create2AndCall(initcode, nil).Bytecode() ``` We have a lot of places in the codebase where we concatenate bytes, cast from `vm.OpCode` . By taking tihs approach instead, thos places can be made a bit more maintainable/robust.
gzliudan
force-pushed
the
evm-program
branch
from
b0358c2 to
bca6cea
Compare
benjamin202410
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2025
wanwiset25
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2025
AnilChinchawale
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Ref: ethereum#30725
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an
✅in the boxes that applyImpacted Components
Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,
Put an
✅in the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
✅in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that